home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
QRZ! Ham Radio 4
/
QRZ Ham Radio Callsign Database - Volume 4.iso
/
digests
/
infoham
/
940735.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-11-13
|
25KB
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 94 03:05:18 PDT
From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <info-hams@ucsd.edu>
Errors-To: Info-Hams-Errors@UCSD.Edu
Reply-To: Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: Info-Hams Digest V94 #735
To: Info-Hams
Info-Hams Digest Sun, 3 Jul 94 Volume 94 : Issue 735
Today's Topics:
AEA IsoLoop - Opinion (2 msgs)
Best dual-band HT antenna
Bitching and Moaning
Call-Sign Prefixes (3 msgs)
FCC Address?
FD report NC7K 0B NV
FIELD DAY 1994 REPORT
IPS Daily Report - 02 July 94
ORBS$182.MICRO.AMSAT
Please Informations...
Temp. Conversion Chart: F
Temp. Conversion Chart F & C?
Test-to-license-in-hand time
Yaesu FRG-9600 Mods Wanted
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Info-Hams-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 1994 20:54:00 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!iat.holonet.net!michaelr!ray.wade@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: AEA IsoLoop - Opinion
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
On 06-28-94 DAVE BUSHONG wrote to ALL...
DB> Subject: Re: AEA IsoLoop - Opinion
DB> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 1994 20:26:12 GMT
DB>
DB> ray.wade@michaelr.com (Ray Wade) writes:
DB>
DB> >Was it Barnum who said: You can fool some of the people.........?
DB>
DB> P.T. Barnum's famous quote was "There's a sucker born every minute."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
As to results with an IsoLoop, that fits better!
DB> The quote about fooling "some of the people all of the time" goes like
DB> this:
DB>
DB> "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and you can fool
DB> all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the
DB> people all of the time."- Abraham Lincoln, KZ1O
DB>
K5JCM
* OFFLINE 1.56 * Keep hands off the secretary's reproducing equipment.
.....
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 1994 20:59:00 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!iat.holonet.net!michaelr!ray.wade@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: AEA IsoLoop - Opinion
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
On 06-28-94 CHRIS THOMAS wrote to ALL...
CT> Subject: Re: AEA IsoLoop - Opinion
CT> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 1994 07:09
CT> In article <9406280456191039@michaelr.com>,
CT> ray.wade@michaelr.com (Ray Wade) writes:
CT> >Was it Barnum who said: You can fool some of the people.........?
CT> >
CT> >K5JCM
CT>
CT> The question is who is being deluded, those of us who've worked
CT> 240+ countires in a couple of years with one, or those who who just
CT> plain "know" it doesn't work any good... If it's me, I hope it
CT> continues a while longer. I'd love to make Honor Role with my
^^^^
Is this an acting job Chris? Where are you playing? I'll buy a ticket!
CT> "dummy load".
CT>
CT> -- 73 de Chris Thomas, AA6SQ (ex-WA6HTJ) (CSMSCST@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU)
CT> (DXCC/mixed, DXCC/CW, DXCC/SSB, DXCC/10m, DXCC/RTTY, and 39 of 40
CT> for WAZ, on my "doesn't work" Isoloop)
K5JCM
* OFFLINE 1.56 * Press ESC twice for BBS - ALT-H for intelligence test.
.....................................................
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 1994 04:55:00 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!pacbell.com!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!udel!news2.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!IndyNet!slipuser5.indy.net!user@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: Best dual-band HT antenna
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
> |> I have lost my handheld antenna for the second time. I would
> |> like to know which short duck antenna has would perform the best
> |> with my Alinco 580. I have heard that the one Larson makes is
> |> pretty good. I have also heard that the factory supplied antenna
> |> is pretty much a dummy load.
> |>
The best (reasobably sized) dual band antenna is the antenna that comes
with the Standard dual band radios. They can be purchased separately from a
dealer and sometimes be found at Hamfests (I paid $10 for mine) The
factory antenna on the 580 really stinks on two meters (it is okay on 440)
and I would recommend that it be replaced even if you CAN find it. I would
guess that the Standard antenna improves performance by at least 10 db if
not 20 on 2m.
The Larsen is also very good and probably easier to find.
--
Dave Gingrich, K9DC
Fishers, Indiana
Lockman Mills & Associates
gingrich@indy.net
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 1994 20:33:00 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!iat.holonet.net!michaelr!ray.wade@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: Bitching and Moaning
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
On 06-27-94 FUAT C. BARAN wrote to ALL...
FC> Subject: Re: Bitching and Moaning
FC> Date: 27 Jun 1994 17:52:33 GMT
FC>
FC> In article <940625043051859@michaelr.com>,
FC> Ray Wade <ray.wade@michaelr.com> wrote:
FC>
FC> >So what are YOU doing to improve things, pissing and moaning?
FC>
FC> Trying to convince people that just because it was worse in the past
FC> doesn't mean that what we have now can't be made better and waiting to
^^^^^^^
FC> see how the new FCC computers will improve things once they clear the
FC> backlog. Working with the ARRL to keep folks waiting for their
FC> tickets informed of the current waiting period via an Internet WWW
FC> server, providing the latest info from the FCC on the assigned FC>
callsigns in each district, etc. FC> FC> Pray tell, what are your
contributions to society, besides the above FC> quoted gem? FC> FC>
--Fuat
Among other things, I was the first Ham in Oklahoma to take a Amateur
Radio tower case to the State Supreme Court, thus setting the precedent
for all others in the state. I won! I didn't wait, I acted.
K5JCM
* OFFLINE 1.56 * Dew knot trussed yore spell chequer two fined awl mistakes.
...............................................................................
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 1994 13:52:58 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!mvb.saic.com!news.cerf.net!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!usenet.ufl.edu!usenet.cis.ufl.edu!caen!malgudi.oar.net!witch!doghouse!jsalemi@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: Call-Sign Prefixes
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
In article <2v1otm$rku@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>, Anthony H Aletras (aaletras@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu) writes:
>I have been in OHIO for 3 years and I have been identifying myself as
>N8/SV2ABQ
>
>It could have easily been W8/SV2ABQ or K8/SV2ABQ !!!
>(As courtesy to the country you are visiting you preceed your
>callsign with its prefix)
>
Except in the case of the US and Canada, where the reciprocity treaty
specifies that the prefix goes after your callsign, not before.
73...joe
----------
Joe Salemi, KR4CZ Internet: jsalemi@doghouse.win.net
Compuserve: 72631,23 FidoNet: 1:109/136 MCI Mail: 433-3961
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 1994 14:21:42 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!mvb.saic.com!news.cerf.net!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!caen!malgudi.oar.net!witch!doghouse!jsalemi@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: Call-Sign Prefixes
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
In article <2v1rjm$nk0@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu>, Scott Richard Rosenfeld (ham@wam.umd.edu) writes:
> VE3/NF3I, as I'm operating in Canada but using my own call.
>
>Similarly, when a VE station (VE#XXX) is in Michigan (8-land), he would
>sign W8/VE#XXX, NOT VE#XXX/W8. Just the legalities of it; it doesn't
>really matter to which which anybody actually does, as the general idea
>still comes across.
Sorry, Scott, but you've got it backwards. The treaty between the US
and Canada specifies that the district goes AFTER the call, not before
(the opposite of how the rest of the world does it). So the legalities
in this case are reversed from normal procedure. See Appendix 4 in the
ARRL's "FCC Rule Book" for the full text of the US/Canada treaty.
73...joe
----------
Joe Salemi, KR4CZ Internet: jsalemi@doghouse.win.net
Compuserve: 72631,23 FidoNet: 1:109/136 MCI Mail: 433-3961
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 1994 14:19:10 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!mvb.saic.com!news.cerf.net!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!caen!malgudi.oar.net!witch!doghouse!jsalemi@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: Call-Sign Prefixes
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
In article <48038@mindlink.bc.ca>, Graham Butler (Graham_Butler@mindlink.bc.ca) writes:
> I am going to be travelling through the U.S. this summer, and I
>already posted a message asking whether my Canadian Amateur license is good
>in the U.S. as well, to which the answer was Yes. Apparently I have to
>identify myself with my callsign followed by the prefix followed by "\ <and
>then the prefix of the area that I'm in" How do I know what the prefix
>should be? The ARRL handbook just says that the U.S. callsign prefixes are
>between "WAA-WZZ"!
> Graham
There are 10 callsign districts in the US, so it would be easier if you
let us know which states you'll be in than to list all the states in
each district. <g>
One good hint is to listen to the repeaters in the area you're in;
you'll hear a predominance of a certain number. Also, the repeater ID
will give you a clue what district you're in, though this isn't always
reliable since US hams don't have to change their callsign when they
move anymore.
73...joe
----------
Joe Salemi, KR4CZ Internet: jsalemi@doghouse.win.net
Compuserve: 72631,23 FidoNet: 1:109/136 MCI Mail: 433-3961
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 1994 20:23:00 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!mvb.saic.com!news.cerf.net!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!iat.holonet.net!michaelr!ray.wade@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: FCC Address?
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
On 06-27-94 GLENN MEADER wrote to ALL...
GM> I need to renew my license. I got a 610 form - now what's
GM> the correct address to send it to at the FCC?
Its ON THE FORM at the the top.
K5JCM
* OFFLINE 1.56 * When right, be logical. When wrong, be-fuddle.
....................................................................
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 94 10:27:00 -0800
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!pacbell.com!sgiblab!cs.uoregon.edu!usenet.ee.pdx.edu!fastrac.llnl.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!agate!iat.holonet.net!megasys!tim.marek@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: FD report NC7K 0B NV
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
Had a interesting thought... If all VHF and Sat Qs dont count towards
your total number of transmitters what category is a VHF only field day
in? 0A, 0B, etc??? For FD I was VHF only from 8300 FT Virginia Peak
here in DM09 near Reno, NV.
Using SSB/CW I worked 128 Qs on 50, 144, and 432 Mhz. Managed 2 Sat Qs
through AO21 when it was on the horizon. 6M was FANTASTIC Sunday A.M.
with double hop Es to W3 land at time 20 - 40 DB over S9!. Before then I
needed WV as a new state and now have worked 10 WV stations. Rumor has
it that 2M Es was happening out in the midwest about the same time.
Local club group never checked 10M! With all the Es Sunday they would
have raked in the Qs. Just proves the point to NEVER ASSUME ANYTHING!
Look for me next weekend from the rare grid of DM19 in the CQ WW VHF WPX
contest. 73's ... Tim, NC7K... sk
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 1994 22:59:02 GMT
From: spsgate!mogate!newsgate!news@uunet.uu.net
Subject: FIELD DAY 1994 REPORT
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
In article <1JUL199414342767@elroy.uh.edu> st4j9@elroy.uh.edu (Fanelli, David
A.) writes:
> ...
> How did you operate a 9A station? I coordinated the Clear Lake ARC's Field
> Day using 5A with a Novice/Tech + and OSCAR (145MHz and 430MHz) and we had
> terrible interference between the HF rigs-- if you were monitoring on one
> band and another station keyed up, you heard "CQ Field Day" from the
> nearby tranceiver that would swamp out any other signal you were trying to
> receive.
>
We ran 6A without too many problems. We had 3 SSB stations running into G5RV's
and 3 CW stations running into verticals. We worked a 12A somewhere. I can't
imagine coordinating 12 stations. Then again, it seems I remember a 16A last
year but that might have been an early morning hallucination.
73... Mark AA7TA
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 1994 00:33:25 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!msuinfo!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!ipso!rwc@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: IPS Daily Report - 02 July 94
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
SUBJ: IPS DAILY SOLAR AND GEOPHYSICAL REPORT
ISSUED AT 2/2330Z JULY 1994 BY IPS RADIO AND SPACE SERVICES
FROM THE REGIONAL WARNING CENTRE (RWC), SYDNEY.
SUMMARY FOR 2 JULY AND FORECAST UP TO 5 JULY
IPS Disturbance Warning 17 was issued on 22 June and is current for
the period 24 June to 4 July
-----------------------------------------------------------
1A. SOLAR SUMMARY
Activity: very low
Flares: none.
Observed 10.7 cm flux/Equivalent Sunspot Number : 083/024
GOES satellite data for 1 July
Daily Proton Fluence >1 MeV: 3.3E+06
Daily Proton Fluence >10 MeV: 1.8E+04
Daily Electron Fluence >2 MeV: 5.0E+08
X-ray background: A8.1
Fluence (flux accumulation over 24hrs)/ cm2-ster-day.
1B. SOLAR FORECAST
03 July 04 July 05 July
Activity Very low Very low Very low
Fadeouts None expected None expected None expected
Forecast 10.7 cm flux/Equivalent Sunspot Number : 084/026
1C. SOLAR COMMENT
None.
-----------------------------------------------------------
2A. MAGNETIC SUMMARY
Geomagnetic field at Learmonth: unsettled to active
Estimated Indices : A K Observed A Index 1 July
Learmonth 19 3434 4333
Fredericksburg 25 24
Planetary 25 22
Observed Kp for 1 July: 4454 3334
2B. MAGNETIC FORECAST
DATE Ap CONDITIONS
03 Jul 20 Unsettled to active.
04 Jul 15 Unsettled to active.
05 Jul 10 Quiet to unsettled.
2C. MAGNETIC COMMENT
Magnetic activity is expected to decline from 5 July onwards.
-----------------------------------------------------------
3A. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION SUMMARY
LATITUDE BAND
DATE LOW MIDDLE HIGH
02 Jul normal fair-normal poor-fair
PCA Event : None.
3B. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION FORECAST
LATITUDE BAND
DATE LOW MIDDLE HIGH
03 Jul normal fair-normal poor-fair
04 Jul normal fair-normal poor-fair
05 Jul normal normal fair
3C. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION COMMENT
NONE.
-----------------------------------------------------------
4A. AUSTRALIAN REGION IONOSPHERIC SUMMARY
MUFs at Sydney were near predicted monthly values
Observed T index for 02 July: 22
Predicted Monthly T Index for July is 30.
4B. AUSTRALIAN REGION IONOSPHERIC FORECAST
DATE T-index MUFs
03 Jul 30 Near predicted monthly values.
04 Jul 30 Near predicted monthly values.
05 Jul 25 Near predicted monthly values.
4C. AUSTRALIAN REGION COMMENT
Intermittent Sporadic E layer was observed yesterday. Occasional
Sporadic E layer and Spread F may degrade local propagations
conditions today.
--
IPS Regional Warning Centre, Sydney |IPS Radio and Space Services
email: rwc@ips.oz.au fax: +61 2 4148331 |PO Box 5606
RWC Duty Forecaster tel: +61 2 4148329 |West Chatswood NSW 2057
Recorded Message tel: +61 2 4148330 |AUSTRALIA
------------------------------
Date: 1 Jul 94 20:17:00 GMT
From: news-mail-gateway@ucsd.edu
Subject: ORBS$182.MICRO.AMSAT
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
SB KEPS @ AMSAT $ORBS-182.D
Orbital Elements 182.MICROS
HR AMSAT ORBITAL ELEMENTS FOR THE MICROSATS
FROM WA5QGD FORT WORTH,TX July 1, 1994
BID: $ORBS-182.D
TO ALL RADIO AMATEURS BT
Satellite: UO-14
Catalog number: 20437
Epoch time: 94181.17094406
Element set: 6
Inclination: 98.5888 deg
RA of node: 265.7706 deg
Eccentricity: 0.0011270
Arg of perigee: 148.7156 deg
Mean anomaly: 211.4700 deg
Mean motion: 14.29848006 rev/day
Decay rate: 1.2e-07 rev/day^2
Epoch rev: 23144
Checksum: 288
Satellite: AO-16
Catalog number: 20439
Epoch time: 94178.21712155
Element set: 804
Inclination: 98.5981 deg
RA of node: 264.1007 deg
Eccentricity: 0.0011033
Arg of perigee: 158.0706 deg
Mean anomaly: 202.0949 deg
Mean motion: 14.29901614 rev/day
Decay rate: 1.0e-07 rev/day^2
Epoch rev: 23103
Checksum: 269
Satellite: DO-17
Catalog number: 20440
Epoch time: 94178.24044877
Element set: 804
Inclination: 98.5990 deg
RA of node: 264.4494 deg
Eccentricity: 0.0011506
Arg of perigee: 157.3761 deg
Mean anomaly: 202.7928 deg
Mean motion: 14.30041300 rev/day
Decay rate: 1.7e-07 rev/day^2
Epoch rev: 23105
Checksum: 287
Satellite: WO-18
Catalog number: 20441
Epoch time: 94181.15467102
Element set: 807
Inclination: 98.5977 deg
RA of node: 267.3273 deg
Eccentricity: 0.0012054
Arg of perigee: 149.3828 deg
Mean anomaly: 210.8060 deg
Mean motion: 14.30015655 rev/day
Decay rate: 1.0e-08 rev/day^2
Epoch rev: 23147
Checksum: 283
Satellite: LO-19
Catalog number: 20442
Epoch time: 94178.75317896
Element set: 803
Inclination: 98.5991 deg
RA of node: 265.2158 deg
Eccentricity: 0.0012241
Arg of perigee: 155.8695 deg
Mean anomaly: 204.3055 deg
Mean motion: 14.30111899 rev/day
Decay rate: 3.1e-07 rev/day^2
Epoch rev: 23114
Checksum: 309
Satellite: UO-22
Catalog number: 21575
Epoch time: 94181.15732371
Element set: 508
Inclination: 98.4344 deg
RA of node: 255.3931 deg
Eccentricity: 0.0006801
Arg of perigee: 252.7171 deg
Mean anomaly: 107.3281 deg
Mean motion: 14.36921644 rev/day
Decay rate: 4.6e-07 rev/day^2
Epoch rev: 15494
Checksum: 295
Satellite: KO-23
Catalog number: 22077
Epoch time: 94181.22418147
Element set: 403
Inclination: 66.0834 deg
RA of node: 252.6851 deg
Eccentricity: 0.0014564
Arg of perigee: 283.4501 deg
Mean anomaly: 76.4893 deg
Mean motion: 12.86286916 rev/day
Decay rate: -3.7e-07 rev/day^2
Epoch rev: 8846
Checksum: 315
Satellite: AO-27
Catalog number: 22825
Epoch time: 94179.73033811
Element set: 301
Inclination: 98.6528 deg
RA of node: 255.4221 deg
Eccentricity: 0.0008353
Arg of perigee: 170.1806 deg
Mean anomaly: 189.9539 deg
Mean motion: 14.27627600 rev/day
Decay rate: -1.0e-08 rev/day^2
Epoch rev: 3933
Checksum: 300
Satellite: IO-26
Catalog number: 22826
Epoch time: 94179.21993428
Element set: 301
Inclination: 98.6522 deg
RA of node: 254.9542 deg
Eccentricity: 0.0008849
Arg of perigee: 173.5876 deg
Mean anomaly: 186.5418 deg
Mean motion: 14.27731640 rev/day
Decay rate: -3.0e-08 rev/day^2
Epoch rev: 3926
Checksum: 333
Satellite: KO-25
Catalog number: 22830
Epoch time: 94179.22798762
Element set: 306
Inclination: 98.5529 deg
RA of node: 252.0960 deg
Eccentricity: 0.0012037
Arg of perigee: 140.4552 deg
Mean anomaly: 219.7507 deg
Mean motion: 14.28058431 rev/day
Decay rate: 2.2e-07 rev/day^2
Epoch rev: 3927
Checksum: 303
/EX
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 1994 20:46:00 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!iat.holonet.net!michaelr!ray.wade@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: Please Informations...
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
On 06-28-94 MARCOS AURELIO wrote to ALL...
MA> Subject: Please Informations...
MA> Date: 28 Jun 94 16:48:00 GMT
MA> Message-ID: <4a.30961.40.0CE9C924@ax.apc.org>
MA> Organization: Hot-Line BBS - +55-21-537-1603 - Rio/BRAZIL
MA>
MA> Please send me informations.
If you get some, send me your leftovers.
K5JCM
* OFFLINE 1.56 * Humanity - one big dysfunctional family
................................................................
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 94 10:47:00 -0800
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!agate!iat.holonet.net!alley!john.hiatt@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: Temp. Conversion Chart: F
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
AW>Does anyone know of a source for a quick temperature conversion chart
AW>between F and C? I can't recall the formula (or where to find it), and
AW>would just like a way to rapidly convert between the two scales when
AW>in QSO.
To convert from C to F multiply the C temperature time 1.8 and add 32.
So that would be:
(C*1.8)+32=F
(F-32)/1.8=C
Those should work.
---
* OLX 2.1 TD * I was on a roll, till I slipped on the butter.
------------------------------
Date: 3 Jul 94 02:45:23 GMT
From: news-mail-gateway@ucsd.edu
Subject: Temp. Conversion Chart F & C?
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
>In article <2urr2v$7j3@news.iastate.edu> wjturner@iastate.edu writes:
>[in response to a request for Fahrenheit to Celsius conversion table...]
>>C = (5 / 9)*(F - 32)
>Okay, 98.6 F (average human body temperature) equals 37 C (approximately).
>BUT...
>>(C - 40) = (5 / 9)*(F - 40)
No. This should be:
9c-40=5(F-40)
This is not algebraicly equivalent.
--
David L. Wilson INTERNET: dwilson@s850.mwc.edu
Phone: (703)898-1084 (H) Amateur callsign: AC4IU G.S.: FM18fg
------------------------------
Date: 3 Jul 1994 04:57:32 -0400
From: agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!montego!not-for-mail@ames.arpa
Subject: Test-to-license-in-hand time
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
Passed test: Feb 12
Issued: April 28
Received in mail: May 6
--
............................................................................
Matt Rupert - 2984 Pheasant Run Dr. Apt D - Jackson MI 49202 - hoagy@ais.org
Personal Security / UNIX Enthusiast / Amatuer Radio - KB8SGL
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
------------------------------
Date: 29 Jun 1994 23:50:27 GMT
From: eng.iac.honeywell.com!ws07.iac.honeywell.com!dphillips@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Yaesu FRG-9600 Mods Wanted
To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
Does anyone have information on HF/Scan Rate mods for the Yaesu FRG-9600 VFH Receiver ?
There was a kit some time ago that added HF to this radio, and I would be interested in
any information regarding it or any other modifications to this radio.
Thanks in advance
Dave
--
Dave Phillips | "Takeoffs are optional,
Phoenix, AZ, USA | Landings are mandatory,
dphillips@WS07.iac.honeywell.com | Pilot error is not an accident,
KB7JS | All airplanes have personalities."
------------------------------
End of Info-Hams Digest V94 #735
******************************